Return to CreateDebate.comcomunicacaoescrita • Join this debate community

Comunicação Escrita



Welcome to Comunicação Escrita!

Comunicação Escrita is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


Twitter
Twitter addict? Follow us and be the first to find out when debates become popular!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS Silvia1E

Reward Points:5
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
100%
Arguments:5
Debates:0
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
5 most recent arguments.
1 point

Sex Education should be not mandatory in Brazilian Schools. Firstly, Brazil has no developed research on it and an also prepared material. Thus, Brazil will need more prepared teachers too, having a lot of problems already with the "basic" education, done by inexperienced teachers (not sufficiently prepared) mainly at public schools.

Also Brazil is a country with a huge development of different cultures and consequently, many different religions, and inserting Sex Education may be visualized by some religions as an offense. As a matter of fact, Sex Education is a subject that should be discussed at home, it's a decision that should be make by parents and not school's.

2 points

In my opinion, and also as Renata said, death penalty it's a very dangerous situation if adopted in Brazil. Although prison system here has no organization satisfactorily, death penalty would be not the solution in terms of the treatment of inmates. Brazil's law has serious problems and manly because it is too bureaucratic, that means that inmates' process still will taking long to be resolved (lawyers will continue looking for new measures to reverse the situation).

Besides, even being an ex-convict, every citizen have the equal rights as Constitution determines. So, he has right to be judged, serve his sentence and try to start over again. In fact, Brazil has a lot of examples of ex-convicts who managed to overcome difficulties and their past, and had the chance even to work again, start a family as new citizen, and more and more companies are adopting this method of hiring ex-convicts. So we can conclude that death penalty even being adopted by other countries, in Brazil it's not the best option.

1 point

I agree with Aline, it is not healthy for mother's mind and body keeps an anencephalic baby inside her body. Once fetus died, is really dangerous to mother's body, but mainly her's psychological will be affected.

Besides, the brain is a vital organ and it's proven that anencephalic babies have a very short and limited life in most of cases (the babies usually die by cardiorespiratory arrest few hours after their birth), deciding to keep the baby will just postpone the family suffering, and mostly mother's.

Also, doing abortion the mother can overcomes easier and faster and she can also try to have a healthy baby with the whole family supporting.

1 point

I totally agree with Lucas. It's absurd and abusive have a media censorship in our society and worse than it is the fact that people, in general, even noticing and not agreeing with it, remain stagnant before it. Maybe people have created this type of conception, because they think, in Brazil at least, that now there's no a severe kind of media censorship, comparing with 50s' and political context in that time, that means: explicit media censorship. But every piece of information it's manipulated by a group of people, who decides what people can see, creating forms to control, to manipulate people's mind. Therefore, the more evident media censorship probably is in manipulating news. We have newspapers in television, in internet and printed, and each of them decides what and how information must been read by people, stimulating a specific critical sense. In fact, is really usual large media companies have an agreement with government, because manipulating information is easier to create a image bad or good of who is governing.

1 point

I agree with Hanna. We are born in a technological world, the contact it's immediate. An interesting example is my friends' sister: she's three and lives in Miami. Living there, her mom buys a lot of technological toys because they are cheaper than here, so she has a lot of this kind of toys. When I was meeting her for the first time, I didn't know what kind a gift choose and I buy her a plush toy, like a little bear. When she saw the plush, she didn't care at all, she thought very uninteresting in contrast with the oder toys she already had. The little girl already had contact with Ipads, Iphones, video games and all these stuffs being three years old, now imagine how she will be in future, is really scary. I'm using this example, but I know that is not so common this kind of situation, but we can notice that we start to create an addiction too soon: as we get older, it's almost impossible to dissolve this bond with technological objects.

Silvia1E has not yet created any debates.

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here