Return to CreateDebate.comcomunicacaoescrita • Join this debate community

Comunicação Escrita


Debate Info

12
7
For Against
Debate Score:19
Arguments:17
Total Votes:20
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 For (11)
 
 Against (5)

Debate Creator

RobertoCF(83) pic



2E Sex Education Should Be Mandatory in Brazilian Schools

Evening Group 4

For: Joyce Oliveira Zinsly & Daniella Fagundes Ferrari

Against: Isabela de Almeida Carmo & Simone das Graças Rodrigues Jacob

For

Side Score: 12
VS.

Against

Side Score: 7
2 points

In Brazilian schools there is not a specific subject about sex education. Still, in the humdrum events of daily life, children can watch spicy scenes in a soap-opera, a movie and even in the streets, or see a magazine picture. These situations may obviously provoke a natural curiosity in the children about sex. If there were sex education classes in school, then all the students would get enough information to learn everything they should know about it, so they can have a good and healthy sex life later, when they are ready to.

In fact, most parents do not feel comfortable to talk about sex with their children, and neither do the children. The teenagers usually get information only with friends, which is not something reasonable, since they probably rely on what they learnt from television programs, websites and web blogs that are not always reliable. Even if a father or a mother feels open to talk to their son or daughter about sex, they may not have enough recent information about sex or anything related to it. After all, we always have something to learn. For this reason it is necessary to have a well-trained professional who knows how to approach this theme to teenagers and also to their parents, because it is also important to them, since they probably still have doubts. This way, they would know that this subject should be faced seriously and if they can trust the teacher and the school.

It might be surprising that in the 21st century students may only get information about sex in Biology or Science classes. It is certainly not enough, since these subjects will not discuss everything related to sex. They usually focus on life matters such as “a baby is made through sexual intercourse between a man and a woman” and teaches about prevention, telling that “AIDS, HPV and syphilis are sexually transmitted diseases, so that is why it is important to always use a condom”. A sex education class would treat and discuss themes like early pregnancy, sexually transmitted diseases, contraceptive methods, menstrual cycle, masturbation, male and female reproductive systems and phases of the human development and of pregnancy. Besides, it is very important for the teacher of this subject to be prepared to deal with possible psychological issues some children may have – such as repression or sex abuse history –, and also the teacher needs to develop discussions about relationships, feelings, emotions and sexual orientation. Some Biology teachers may not be capable of doing this.

In countries such as United States or Canada, sex education programs have been in their syllabuses for decades. It is high time Brazil developed special classes to promote a healthy sex education to its youth.

Joyce2E & Daniella2E

Side: For
Aline2E(5) Disputed
1 point

I think this kind of issue at school it is a little bit awkward, since it must be discuss at home, with family, for some reasons: one, in Brazil there is no professionals qualify to teach this to the students and this requires that the Government spend more money and qualification for those professionals; two, the sex life of any person have to be private and this class could expose the children and teenagers, making them unconfortable with the school envirenment.

Furthermore, this issue could stimulate the premature sex life.

Side: Against
Tamara2E(5) Disputed
1 point

It does need to be discussed at home, but just because something needs to happen, it does not necessarily means it will. How many households in Brazil have supportive parents willing to hold this kind of difficult conversation with their children? Not many, that is for sure. It is also the school's duty to educate - not to take over the parent's hole, but to aid them. And why would the fact the Government would need to spend money with this kind of important tool to educate our children be an argument against sex education classes? It is not a waste of money, it is money used on what it should be used. And I see no connection between the exposition of the students' sex life and sex education classes. In fact, if nothing, sex education classes are supposed to make children more comfortable with the subject.

And I completely disagree with the last point made. As said by Joyce and Daniella, children are exposed to sex all the time, be it in magazines or outdoors. I can assure you that sex education classes will not introduce them to what sex is. These classes are, on the contrary, supposed to educate and prevent against any kind of ill behavior related to sex children might have. They are already exposed to it, might as well educate them.

In order to discuss this issue, it is important to know what is in fact taught in sex education classes. Putting "sex" and "children" in the same sentence does not need to necessarily mean something bad at all times.

Side: For
1 point

The main point I agree with Joyce's post is the one about phsycological and emotional aspects of sex education. As presented in the post, Brazil's ways of dealing with the subject so far is with biology classes, and that obviously only deals with the physical aspects of the issue.

Sex should not be a tabu anymore in any society. Religion, for example, has made such a big deal of it that even nowadays, in a very modern world, it is still a very delicate subject. There are, and there have always been, many people that do not have a healthy sexual life because of wrong beliefs and wrong ideas about sex, ideas that have been imposed to everyone since a long time and for very convenient reasons. Because of this imposed ideas, people have moral, ethical, psycological and emotional problems corcerning sex.

I do not mean that the physical part is not important, it is. But in my opinion, to have professionals that were able to deal with all these aspects of sexual life would be a very rich gain for teens. This would slowly change people's ways of dealing with sex, would create a more aware society. The frequency of this classes or programs would make the issue more easy and natural to be dealt by teens and would surely bring benefits to individuals and society.

Side: For
1 point

The youth of today has easy access to the media, which can be inappropriate in many ways. Children can be exposed to pornography, discovering their sexuality alone and precariously. That might even develop a conflict that could be avoided if the matter were placed on the table since the early hour.

School has the central purpose of educating children and teenagers, preparing them for a better life. Then why not include sexual education in their program, by showing with a sufficient grounding the best way of everything to happen?

The purpose which would be assigned to the school is not to encourage sex, but to alert and take possible doubts that may arise. Thus, it would raise a teenager who is more informed, more able to discuss the matter, becoming a more responsible adult.

Side: For
1 point

It is important establish that parents have an important role in the education of their children, but is either important that the subject of sex is discussed elsewhere that the young attend. Sex has been a taboo for several years, but nowadays it’s losing forces, principally to media. Since they are treated in magazines and television, why not in schools? The media is concerned with the market, and how to reach it, and the way sex is approached by them is totally arbitrary. The school role is teach, and in a world of such transformations, teach about sex is instruct the children how to deal with all that arbitrary information as well.

Moreover, children and adolescents are discovering the limits of sexuality in increasingly early age. The instruction without myths and prejudgment given in alliance by the school and parents could be a good way to young people learns to deal with that, improving even the issue about prevention and sexually transmitted diseases.

Side: For
1 point

Sex Ed should be at the basis of each school's syllabus. Especially in Brazil, a country which has a high level of teenage pregnancy. There should be investments and supervision towards ensuring the biological, psychological aspects and family planning. Saying that it encourages an early sex life is a fallacy. Children and teens are exposed to sex everyday through mass media, such as television and music. But high-quality information does not always come to their ears. The subject is a taboo, especially for the older generations, and this becomes a problem when parents are not discussing it with their children. The problems which a lack of information on the matter provoke, such as unplanned pregnancy and acquiring STIs (which cost a lot of money from the public health funds), are already enough reason for the government to create programs with qualified individuals to bring information to schools in even the most remote locations.

Side: For
1 point

It seems to me this issue is more serious than we usually tend to consider.

Young people are engaging in sexual experiences very early these days, frequently with insufficient orientation to defend themselves against the related risks. When we look at the teen pregnancy rates and sexually transmitted diseases, for instance, it makes sense to have this particular type of education in the school curriculum.

Many parents find such talk uneasy and all these issues can be properly and smartly dealt within an educational setting by professionals.

Knowing more about such a crucial topic makes difference and sometimes can be life-altering

Side: For
1 point

The theme "sexuality" has always been seen as a taboo, which means people rather ignore the subject than openly discuss it and therefore avoid undesired consequences. Nowadays, information about sex is available for eveyone but not everything is appropriated for the youngest generations. If Sex Education becomes mandatory in our schools, this might be a chance for teenagers to get helpful information that will guide them through this process of change and discovery that is adolescence. By doing that, the statistics for teenage pregnancy, sexually transmitted diseases, rape, and other sex-related problems might change for the better, since the students will have enough acknowledgement to prevent these issues from happening.

Side: For
1 point

Sex education should definitely be mandatory in Brazilian schools. Be clarified that sex education does not mean to teach how to have sex! Adolescents must be in touch with this sort of information, which sooner or later will be needed. Not specifically about sex, this type of education should include mainly the functioning of the body. But in school, the discussion of sex is always polemic, as parents hold widely divergent opinions about it. Sex as a social phenomenon should not be approached. Only physiological facts and information should be privileged. Sex and its practical consequences. One way or another, teenagers will get to know about it. Actually, these youngsters rarely talk about it at home. With older friends, in the internet, in the streets; it does not matter how or where. The fact is that they do need to be prepared to know how to act regardless of what their parents think about it. Information can never be too much.

Side: For
1 point

To my mind, sex education should be thought in schools all the way through elementary school (5ª a 8ª série). This is a critical period which kids are becoming teenagers and dealing with so many changes in their bodies, minds and social groups. Of course it should be thought by psychologists very well trained to deal with those young minds that are starting to see life from a different angle. The bottom line for those classes should be INFORMATION. No one would be invited to talk about their own lives, they should learn that it is a very personal topic and it is not supposed to be shared or discussed in the classroom, however it also shouldn’t be a taboo: the teenagers have to be comfortable enough to ask their questions very naturally (without risking to feel embarrassed in front of the classmates) to people that are there to help them, only aiming their well being and happiness. Information, about anything, is never enough; we can always learn something new and acknowledge it for life. Adolescence is a very delicate phase in everyone’s life and having someone well prepared to help may become something priceless in those teenagers’ lives.

Side: For
1 point

Absolutely. Sex education is very important, mainly nowadays. Children are getting access earlier and earlier to sex content and in a bad way (in most cases). If they were educated about this subject, in proper ways, since early age, a lot of problems such as early pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases spread, could be avoided. The chances of awareness when one is young is higher. Also, it is important to teach children how to behave, how to react and how to understand sex relationsip. We are living times in which sex is something openly discussed, widely explored, massified. Present. And, with it, sexual intolerance, as well. Thus, teaching children what sex is, a lot of issues would be vanished.

Side: For
2 points

Before taking any step towards the beginning of a sex education in Brazilian schools, it is necessary to have an educational policy involving the Ministry of Education and Culture – MEC –, Psychologists and Psychotherapists and parents, as well as the schools´ representatives, in a way that a joint action is set within society.

Today’s Brazilian schools do not have enough resources and support to introduce the sex education subject in schools, because there is no adequate support material neither a general standard established on what the teachers would use in class. Besides, as they are not always trained how to properly teach sex education, they start to pass on their own morals and beliefs which may go against the individual's moral and religious beliefs, as well as differ from family values and background education.

Sex education should be taught at home by the children's parents since having it in schools does not substitute the family’s role on that issue, and at the same time both, parents and educators do not believe in the co-responsibility work. Some say that sex education encourages teenagers to start their sex life earlier than recommended. These so-called “classes”, for instance describing step-by-step how to use a condom, would instigate their curiosity impelling them to having thoughts and actions not proper for their age. How many teachers and instructors feel prepared for this task?

Isabela2E

Simone2E

Side: Against
2 points

Sex education is a role for the children's parents, It's something natural but personal.

In schools they should only teach the science involving sex.

Side: Against
1 point

Sex Education should be not mandatory in Brazilian Schools. Firstly, Brazil has no developed research on it and an also prepared material. Thus, Brazil will need more prepared teachers too, having a lot of problems already with the "basic" education, done by inexperienced teachers (not sufficiently prepared) mainly at public schools.

Also Brazil is a country with a huge development of different cultures and consequently, many different religions, and inserting Sex Education may be visualized by some religions as an offense. As a matter of fact, Sex Education is a subject that should be discussed at home, it's a decision that should be make by parents and not school's.

Side: Against
1 point

Despite sexuality being an important topic, and learning more about it could mean to prevent diseases and non expected pregnancy, there are another topics that students could learn at school that would prevent another harmfull things as well, and they do not have acess to these subjects. For example, teenagers have a frequent contact with legal or ilegal drugs throughout their lives, which can be dangereous for their health and morality, but they sometimes do not know the damages these things can cause because they were not taught about them. So, if sexuality should be a mandatory subject due to this importance to prevent certain things, another subjects should be included with the same purpose.

For example, in a prior debate of our group, we were discussing whether Libras should be a mandatory subject, and one of the arguments used against it was that there were neither space in the scholar schedule or prepared professionals to do it.Libras is important as well as teaching about sexuality, but perhaps the educational system is not prepared to deal with it.

More over to give to teachers the responsability of teaching it is once taking parents out of the obligation of participating of their children life.

There are another subjects that could be included in the scholar schedule, but how to decide which of them is the most necessary to be included?

Side: Against